So one approach to understanding leadership is to focus on person where I personally see theories of leadership are explanations of leadership based on the idea that some people are simply natural leaders because they possess personality characteristics that make them effective. One personnel fewer idabelle that is associated with effective leadership. He's intelligent, being intelligent, improves leadership, as long as a leader is able to communicate in a way that is easily understood by his or her followers. Other research has found that a leaders social skills such as the ability to accurately perceive the needs and goals of the group members are also important to effective leadership. People who are more sociable and therefore are better able to communicate with others tend to make good leaders. Other more eyeballs that relates to leadership effectiveness.
Including verbal skills, creativity, self confidence, emotional stability, cautiousness in agreeableness. And of course, the individual skills at the task at hand are important. leaders who have expertise in the area of their leadership will be more effective than those who did not. Because so many characteristics seem to be related to leadership skills. Some researchers have attempted to account for leadership, not in terms of individual threes, but in terms of a package of three that successful leaders seem to have. Some have considered this in terms of charisma, charismatic leaders, all leaders who are enthusiastic, committed and self confident, who tend to talk about the importance of group goals at a broad level, and who made personal sacrifices for the group.
Charismatic leaders expressed views that support and validate existing group norms, then it also contained a vision of what the group could or should be. charismatic leaders use the referent power to monitor elite athletes and inspire others and research has found a positive relationship between leaders charisma and effective leadership performance. Another treat these approach to leadership is based on the idea that leaders take either transactional or transformational leadership styles with their subordinates. transactional leaders are the moral regular leaders who work with their subordinates to help them understand what is required of them and to get the job done. transformational leaders on the other hand, are more likely charismatic leaders. They have a vision of where the group is going in attempt to stimulate and inspire their workers to move beyond their present status and to create new and better future.
Transformational leaders are those who can reconfigure or transform the groups more